|قاری کا تجربہ
|تجاویز برائے ترمیم
|یہ مضمون منتخب مضمون کے معیار کا حامل ہے۔
|پیشہ ور، نمایاں، اور مکمل؛ موسوعی معلومات کا بہترین ماخذ۔
|مزید مواد کے اضافہ کی ضرورت نہیں ہے تاآنکہ نئی معلومات میسر ہو؛ نثری معیار میں مزید اصلاحات کا امکان ہے۔
(بمطابق اگست 2010)
|The article is well-organized and essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from this WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
|Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting.
|Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style issues may need addressing. Peer review may help.
(بمطابق March 2010)
|The article has attained good article status.
|Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (although not equalling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia.
|Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.
(بمطابق November 2009)
|The article is mostly complete and without major issues, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
|Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.
|A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should also be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.
(بمطابق November 2009)
|The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains a lot of irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant issues or require substantial cleanup.
|Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.
|Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and address cleanup issues.
(بمطابق May 2009)
|An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources.
|Provides some meaningful content, but the majority of readers will need more.
|Provision of references to reliable sources should be prioritised; the article will also need substantial improvements in content and organisation.
(بمطابق November 2006)
|A very basic description of the topic.
|Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition.
|Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority.
(بمطابق July 2009)
|The article has attained featured list status.
|Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.
|No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available.
(بمطابق December 2012)
|Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.
|There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.
|Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.
(بمطابق June 2007)
|صارفین سانچہ کے تختہ مشق (تخلیق | آئینہ) اور ثابتات (تخلیق) میں تجربات کرسکتے ہیں۔
براہ کرم /دستاویز کے ذیلی صفحہ پر زمرہ جات شامل فرمائیں۔ اس سانچہ کے ذیلی صفحات۔